About Me

Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

A Gay Marriage Quiz

“Okay, get your thinking hats on, class, please, because we have a little quiz today and let’s have no cheating, borrowing answers, or conferencing.  It’s an easy quiz, just one question, and those of you who have kept up on current affairs–and not the affairs in Hollywood or on Desparate Housewives–should do just fine if you’ve been paying attention to the world around you.”

Sounds of discontent begin.

“Ok, here we go.  You will have more than enough time to pose queries and then 10 seconds from the time I finish asking the question and the end of the Q&A to write your answer.  And stop the complaining that 10 seconds isn’t enough time.  The quiz requires only a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response.   

“The one question is, and wait until I finish asking it before you interrupt, please:  Has any state in the United States of America ever approved by a constitutional, popular vote the legalization of marriages of people of the same gender?  Yes or no?”

Suzie at once raises her hand and blurts out, “You never said we had to know this for a test!”

“Well, no, Suzie, but this isn’t a test, it’s just a quiz.”

“Yeah, but still, it’s no fair,” Suzie adds as she folds her arms in indignation and murmurs of agreement filter through the room.

“What do you mean by, ‘constitutional, popular vote,’ anyways?” Johnny blurts out.  “What’s so popular about voting?”

“No, Johnny, ‘popular’ there refers to ‘reflecting the will of the people,’ not ‘popularity’ as with rock stars, for example.”

Johnny harrumphs.

“Any other questions?”

“Yeah, Teach, ah got a question,” Lionel chimes in.  “What about this constitution thing, huh?  I mean, what’s dat got to do with it?  Who cares what some old White dudes wrote down thousands of years ago?”

Encouraged by a smattering of tepid applause, Lionel goes on.  “I mean, if some sistah and some other sistah or some brutha and some other brutha wanna make hookin’ up all legal and whatevah, why not let them be happy?  Ya know what ah mean?”

Lionel returns to his seat to another smattering.

“Umm, Lionel, I know what you mean, I think, but first of all, it was hundreds, not thousands, of years ago, 1787, to be precise, and . . .”

“Wait, what’s all this have to do with the quiz?” Dwight asks.

“Good point, Dwight, and if there are no other questions, the 10 second answering time begins now.”

“Wait, wait, hold up, please!  How much will this count toward our final average?” Suzie blurts out.

In the event it wasn’t obvious, that dialogue never actually happened verbatim although in one way or another it may well be the topic of discussion in many a classroom over the next week or so given the most recent trashing of America’s Constitution by the Iowa Supreme Court:  http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97B1TH80&show_article=1.

Once again, a judicial entity has superseded the authority and the right of the American people to determine who is legally entitled to marry whom in an ostensible democratic republic. 

This issue of homosexual marriage seems to have a life of its own.  Voted down by popular vote in California last November when Left Coasters resoundingly, and surprisingly, endorsed this simple 14 word amendment to its constitution, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California,” one would have thought the case was closed.

Not by a long shot.

Even though the vote was 52.3% to 47.7% against the gay agenda, in one of the most liberal states in the nation, that expression of the majority will of the people only ignited homosexual activists who then resorted to heated demonstrations, rioting, threats of violence, and even death threats to get their way. 

(See “Homosexuals Resort To (More) Threats of Violence,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=745, for details and links to those efforts at intimidation.) 

Undeterred by that defeat, and preceding it, homosexuals have also been resorting to liberal state courts as a remedy. . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOMOSEXUALS AND DR. PAUL CAMERON

The following are a few comments posted about my series on homosexuality in America. Since he was maligned so, I took the opportunity to contact Dr. Cameron and his rebuttal can be read on my website, http//genelalor.com.  [MY COMMENTS ON THE COMMENTS ARE IN BRACKETS.]

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Freeper mommy. said, in August 3rd, 2008 at 8:19 pm

Wow, what good references you have!  [SARCASM?]

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Zoe Brain said, in August 4th, 2008 at 2:26 am

The source for the Family Research Council’s pamphlet is Dr Paul Cameron.

He either resigned , or was expelled (depending upon who you believe) from the American Psychological Association in 1983 over ethics issues - making stuff up, falsifying data.  [LIES, DAMNED LIES, AND PHONY STATS]

In 1984 the Nebraska Psychological Association issued a statement disassociating itself “from the representations and interpretations of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron”.

In 1986 the American Sociological Association, following a report from its Committee on the Status of Homosexuals in Sociology, passed a resolution condemning Dr. Cameron for “consistent misrepresentation of sociological research”.

In 1996, the Board of Directors of the Canadian Psychological Association approved a position statement disassociating the organisation from Cameron’s work on sexuality, stating that he had “consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism”

Anything Dr Cameron says requires cross-checking with other sources.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

[Zoe, Zoe, Zoe!

Do see my previous articles and DO try not to wallow in fibs and innuendo!

Cameron was not expelled from the APA. As for the criticisms by other organizations, we all know–or should know–that they too have their own agendas, just as the American Psychiatric Association had when it caved to pressures from the gay lobby to change its diagnosis of homosexuality as being deranged.

And, in the interests of fairness and objectivity, please advise if you are gay.]

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Jamie In Las Vegas said, in August 4th, 2008 at 11:45 am 

Paul Cameron’s research has long been rebutted, disproven, debunked, pick your word. Just logically speaking, much of his statistics make no sense, whether or not he has been blasted by his peers–which he has.

Feel free to use Cameron’s statistics among your Freeper audience, [JAMIE DOESN’T SEEM TO BE A BIG FAN OF NEWREPUBLIC.COM] but don’t be surprised to be utterly ignored in a more mainstream arena. Cameron’s “science” is worthless.

One source (there are many others):
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_cameron.html

And yep, I’m gay.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
[Berlet98 said, in August 5th, 2008 at 12:35 am

Jamie, you seem all in a lather!

Unfortunately for gays and for society, Cameron’s stats make a great deal of sense.

As for his “peers” and the mainstream arena/media, their objectivity has long been in disrepute, especially in the case of the author of that UCDavis piece. One cannot expect objectivity in a discussion over the
homosexual “lifestyle” from a guy who has spent most of his adult life defending it, now can one?

I did seek out Dr. Cameron for his take on the matter and he graciously provided the following links for your perusal:
http://www.familyresearchinst.org and
http://www.ejssb.org.

If you are really interested in the truth on this matter, I suggest you review them, as well as his website. However, I think we all know you won’t.

Good luck!]

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Jamie in Las Vegas said, in August 5th, 2008 at 12:57 am

Nope, not in a lather. A little frustrated, perhaps. Mostly because I know that the views of Cameron–and thus those who put their trust in his findings–are wrong. But I can’t do anything about it, because any source I give you, you will dismiss as readily as you assume I will of the ones you provided me.

There is an impasse here that is unlikely to be breached, least of all by me, a guy with a little-noticed blog. I’ve commented just a couple of times here, with only one aim.

That is to tell you and your readers that the things here at your site on homosexuality (and on sites like Free Republic) seem so far off base to a gay person like me. The assumptions made about gay people are unlike anything that actually exists in my life, or the lives of any gay people I know.

It is impossible to take your views seriously when I know for a fact that much of what is said is false. Unfortunately whenever I try to point that out, I’m accused of lying, subterfuge or lack of intelligence. I’d just like people to consider that–not being gay themselves–they just MIGHT have some preconceived notions that aren’t true.

I don’t need to research what being gay is all about. I AM gay. And I know that my life is not reflected by Cameron’s outrageous studies, nor by most of what I’ve read here.
.............................................................................................................................................................

[SEE DR. PAUL CAMERON’S REBUTTAL ON HTTP://GENELALOR.COM/]

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOMOSEXUALS VIOLENCE IN AMERICA

In days of old when knights were bold/ And “gay” was not invented,/ They went along their hidden way/ And seemed to be contented.

That bit of doggerel is simplistic, of course, but it did seem that forty years ago homosexuals seemed happier in the closet.  That may not have been altogether true but prior to co-opting and misusing the word “gay,” they definitely seemed gayer than they seem today. 

Perhaps gays were seething underneath, and it’s true that some may have been bullied and ridiculed, but they didn’t seem violent before the mass outings that began with the Stonewall riots in 1969.  (See Parts One to Five of this continuing series.)  That’s all changed today, ironically, as they push for acceptance and assimilation into general society and as they succeed more and more in that quest.  Perhaps, too, since we unfortunately live in a violent world, they feel violence is the path to travel and they have moved on down that road.

(Another disclaimer is in order here.  In no way do I imply that every homosexual is violent any more than I suggest all violence is gay-inspired, although it has mushroomed of late.)

Paul Cameron, Ph.D., of the Family Research Institute documents the violent behaviors that have occurred in the last few decades in his article, “Homosexuals and Violence,”   http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet4.html, and on his website.  Squeamish readers should be cautioned that what Cameron reports  is graphic and unsettling.  (Oddly, it has also been accorded little media attention.)

Incidents he relates include the case of two teen lesbians murdering a 12 year old girl, statistics on male serial killers, ...
 
(For the rest of this article, and parts 1-5, please see http://genelalor.com/)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOMOSEXUALITY IN AMERICA: PART 2 THE FIRST SEXUAL REVOLUTION

nd of ticker feed
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »