About Me

Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Quickies

 STORIES THAT TICKLED MY FANCY

Nice work if you can get it:  The Los Angeles Unified School District is hurting for money and is laying off teachers yet pays some 160 “employed” teachers to do nothing because of union agreements.  Awaiting disposition of various misconduct charges ranging from “sexual contact with students, harassment, theft or drug possession . . . they collect about $10 million in salaries per year — even as the district is contemplating widespread layoffs of teachers because of a financial shortfall.”  Two million dollars has already been expended in salary and legal fees on a single teacher.  And we thought the UAW had it good! (http://www.latimes.com/news/la-me-teachers6-2009may06,0,6604006.story?track=rss

Mahmoud and Bashar and Barack:  Iranian President Ahmadinejad   and Syrian President Assad had a little conference after which “Ahmadinejad boasted that ‘those who one day called Iran and Syria part of the axis of evil now want to develop relations with Iran and Syria.  Circumstances are changing rapidly in our favor. . . We are on the road to victory.’ ”  I do believe Mahmoud was referring to George W. Bush and his administration as “those.”  I also believe congratulations should immediately be extended to Barack Obama for dissolving that axis of evil after barely 100 days in office.  Great victory, Mr. President!  What’s next?  Ending blizzards and hurricanes? (http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=47702)

Mighty Oaks from Little Acorns Grow:  One particular, mighty rotten little ACORN is making news again.  Rumors are afoot that Arthur Sulzberger, Chairman of the soon-to-be-defunct New York Times, is still playing his favorite game of Hide All the News That Doesn’t Fit.  It seems . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HERB SANDLER PURGES SNL

Anyone who remembers the early years of “NBC’s Saturday Night,” later called, “Saturday Night Live,” or “SNL,” with its not-ready-for-prime-time-players, is aware that all subsequent efforts to replicate the original have fallen far short of both its success and its innovative brand of humor.  

Of the original cast, the pratfalling Chevy Chase is now washed-up, the insanely riotous John Belushi and Gilda Radner are long dead as is the later arrival but almost as funny, Chris Farley.   Such personalities as Dan Aykroyd, Garrett Morris, Laraine Newman, and Bill Murray went on to some limited measures of post-SNL success. 

The notoriously-unfunny Al Franken, who always played his schleppy self, went on to host a failed, liberal talk show and is now in process of stealing a United States Senate seat from Republican, Norm Coleman.

With the exception of Franken, the old, improvisational SNL players had at least a modicum of comedic talent as opposed to the newest crew which should be ready for prime time a few months after hell freezes over.  

Even after enticing producer Lorne Michaels back to the show some years back, it’s obvious that SNL will never reclaim its former glory, reasons for which include a lack of talent and the fact that SNL is rarely funny anymore since it has subjugated its humor to Big Media’s Political Correctness.

AmericanThinker.com perfectly illustrated the latter in the recent article on the former “Paper of Record” which prints all the news that fits, the soon-to-be-defunct New York Times:  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/12/the_new_york_times_finally_get.html.

Some bodacious and foolhardy SNL writer(s)...
(Read the rest of this article at http://genelalor.com/.)
Tags: SNL   SANDLER   nyt  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE NEW YORK TIMES AND OIL SUPPLY TRUTH

THE NEW YORK TIMES AND OIL SUPPLY TRUTH

July 3rd, 2008

The New York Times, long a bastion of pessimistic liberalism, which is redundant, was peddling its negative petroleum wares and scares soon after 9/11:  http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9401E2DC123FF937A25753C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=4.  The Times has never retracted its fearmongering view that the only recourse for America’s oil woes is to curb our insatiable lust for oil, in effect to cut back on our industrial production and lifestyle, to conserve ourselves into Third World status since there just ain’t no more oil to be had because of our limited “proven reserves.”  That’s poppycock.

Whether the Commissioner of the U.S. Patent office ever said in 1899 that, “Everything that can be invented has been invented,” the sentiment nevertheless is aptly applied to that NYT article which reflects the narrow point of view of that former “Paper of Record.”  It’s tantamount to believing that if you can’t see something then it isn’t there, such as available petroleum resources.

Granted, that story was published before the cost of oil hit the stratosphere on its way to the mesosphere.  However, it still ignored the facts of unproven but far from unavailable oil reserves. 

In 2006, the grand poobah of the world’s largest oil company, Saudi Aramco, said:

‘We are looking at more than four and a half trillion barrels of potentially recoverable oil. That number translates into 140 years of oil at current rates of consumption, or to put it anther way, the world has only consumed about 18 percent of its conventional oil potential. That fact alone should discredit the argument that peak oil is imminent and put our minds at ease concerning future petrol supplies.’ ” (http://www.radford.edu/~wkovarik/oil/. ) That article concludes with the admonition that “misinformation about future oil supply is something the media and government have the responsibility to correct” and incorporates great detail on the truth about oil reserves.

Another piece of significant interest is this item of information, http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news2.13s.html, which details a single source of oil deposits within our borders which could multiply ten-fold available domestic reserves, news that has gotten little attention from the Times or from anyone else.

Each for its own purposes, Big Oil, Big Government, and the NYT would have us believe that oil is in short supply when ...
 
(For the rest of this article, please see http://genelalor.com)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »