About Me

Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

HAPPY EASTER!

May all who happen to read this have a Happy and Glorious Easter! 
 
Try to keep in mind that Easter Sunday is not all about this: 
 
Easter commemorates the resurrection from the dead of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, which is the real reason for the season:  Easter
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Critiques America's Religion

I suggest President Barrack Hussein Obama speaks only for himself when he outlandishly declared on April 6th that, “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.” Ironically or intentionally dropping that bombshell at the start of the Christian Holy Week, Obama chose his audience well, Turkish Muslims.

If he wanted to re-kindle the widespread rumors that circulated during the campaign that he was a closet Muslim, he couldn’t have picked a better venue than Turkey which has a long-established history of discriminating against Christians and even, in the instance of Armenian Christians, attempting to obliterate them from the face of the Earth.
The Turks must have found great consolation in an American president visiting their country and effectively renouncing America’s Christian heritage following his obsequious bowing to the Muslim King Abdullah.

Had the circumstances been reversed and a professed Muslim-American president renounced Islam in the bowels of the Islamic world, Secret Service or no, Obama could have met the fate of other apostates and been beheaded.

That rumor of his Muslim allegiance had sufficient substance last summer and fall to force Obama-ites to devote much valuable time to refute and condemn it as an absurdity. Whether he and they protesteth too much still remains to be determined.

What is irrefutable is that his heritage and background were distinctly Islamic. His late mother is reputed to have been an atheist, an atheist who happened to marry not one but two Muslim men. Other influences in his life, his African relatives in Kenya as well as his father’s Islamic roots, his years spent in Muslim Indonesia, his Muslim roomies in college, point to the possibility that America’s new leader had more than a smidgen of the Q’uran in his blood.

(Please see “Election 2008: Muslim Smoke and Fire,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=605.)

Personally, despite all that and despite his middle name which he insisted on using at his inauguration, I don’t believe Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. More likely, he is an atheist like his mother and, as such, is an ungodly man by definition. Professed atheists and “ungodly” candidates don’t usually sit very well with the American electorate, however, so Barack needed a base which he found with the radical minister, Jeremiah Wright.

So he sat, religiously, in his pew for 20 years at the Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ–NOT of Allah–and was married by and had his two girls christened by that good reverend. Those facts were offered as proof that Obama was a good, practicing Christian. All they really proved was that he could sit in that pew and swallow Wright’s anti-American rants for two decades and he reinforced his agreement with Wright’s philosophy by allowing him to officiate at his wedding and at the christenings of his kids.

It also didn’t hurt a profoundly ambitious man to create the illusion in the minds of his future constituents that, one, he was not a Muslim and, two, that he was a devoted Christian. As fallen-away as many Americans are today, they still like to think our leaders go to church, a Christian church, in our (approximately) 77% Christian and (approximately) 0.5% Islamic nation.

I would refer the reader to Warner Todd Huston’s article, “What Are We If Not a Christian Nation?” at http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2009/04/what-are-we-if-not-a-christian-nation/, which elucidates the American-Christian “connection” far better than I ever could. I’m tired of beating the dead horse proffered by those who deny America’s, and our Founding Fathers’ essential Christianity.

What I firmly believe happened at Obama’s Turkey stop was that, with or without his trusty teleprompter, our president voiced a seminal belief, or wish, that America is no longer a Christian nation, if it ever was. That belief, or wish, affords him the intellectual license to continue on his amoral, irreligious path, to change us into an atheistic society which he can mold according to his preferences.

May God forgive him and may God forgive all of us if we let him get away with it.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America's Next Tea Party: April 15, 2009

The Boston Tea Party wasn’t much of a party and the ton of tea dumped into Boston harbor in 1773 represented more a sacrifice than it was a protest against Britain’s tea tax. The colonials loved their spot of tea but they loved their freedom and independence far more.

The Boston Tea Party was actually a powder keg which wasn’t the least bit dampened by the frigid New England waters that December night. The massive explosion of that keg helped serve to light the way for the American Revolution which, three years down the dusty roads of 18th century America, led to our Declaration of Independence from an oppressive King George III and a vengeful British Parliament.

The madness of King George and the stupidity and venality of that legislative body whose members, bedecked in their powdered wigs and immersed in their pride and righteous indignation, have been fully documented over the 235 intervening years since that tea party. See here for an abbreviated account of the events and consequences of the Boston Tea Party and a participant’s recollections: http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/teaparty.htm.

Five days from now, Americans will have another opportunity to inform other oppressive ruling bodies that we’re fed up and refuse to take it any longer.

The Congress of the United States and our new, reigning monarch-wanna be, Obama the First, have seen fit to impose on the American people and upon our children and grandchildren undue, repressive, and unnecessary tax burdens which are designed to create, support, and expand massive social programs intent on establishing a massive, dependent welfare state and to “share the wealth,” as King Obama let slip to Joe the Plumber during the campaign.

Most of the machinations in process are still unknown to the citizenry, such programs as ending the Bush tax cuts in 2010, a tactic which will allow our Democrats to assert they did not raise taxes. Taxes will soar because the tax cuts simply expired. Get that?

Our Democratic leaders are actively and subtly employing the ol’ boiling a frog trick: Dump that little green sucker into tepid water and gradually jack up the temperature until, Voila! you have frog legs that taste like chicken, and taxpayers who are boiled alive and ready for the Soylent Green factories–after they pay their taxes.

Scheduled not coincidentally with the day our various governments, led by and linked to the feds, exact their pounds of taxpayer flesh, April 15th, full details on the reasons and purposes behind America’s New Tea Party can be found here: http://www.teapartyday.com/.

There may or may not be any actual tea tossed into the briny on that day. It’s planned as a, hopefully peaceful, national demonstration by good, American citizens who sincerely yet forcefully demand to be heard in Washington, Albany, Trenton, Sacramento, and the rest of our state capitals. We want it made vividly clear that we do not endorse and will never support converting the United States of America into a socialist nation.

As Jefferson wrote in America’s Declaration of Independence, “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

May God bless, save, and preserve America!

(http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

News?

Ages ago, Pete Seeger and Peter, Paul, and Mary whined about where all the flowers had gone and asked the rhetorical question, “Oh, when will they ever learn?/ Oh, when will they ever learn?” Since it’s still only April in our very un-Gore-ishly cold country, a plenitude of flowers isn’t due for another month or so but their question in 2009 could very well be directed to the print media, news services, and our new president-in-training: When will they ever learn?

As American newspaper after American newspaper folds, succumbing to the powerful force of the internet, they say, while seemingly oblivious to the reality that millions of us neither believe their slanted reporting nor trust them as far as we can throw a newspaper delivery truck, they nevertheless continue to report the inconsequential and, most egregiously, their skewed version of “the news.” At the same time, reality keeps biting Obama on the arse but he too doesn’t seem in learning mode.

Cases in point:

The Associated Press believes that teenaged Bristol Palin’s romantic life constitutes a newsworthy story: http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003950844. The highly-respected AP may next report that Bristol, who happens to be the daughter of the much-reviled governor of Alaska, has developed a nasty pimple or that Baby Tripp contracted a mild case of the croup. I can understand the need for variety in AP wires but do the editors there really believe teen romance, or lack thereof, constitutes “news,” per se? Bristol obviously made the mistake of hooking up with a loser who now craves a piece of the publicity pie. That’s as believable as the distinguished Associated Press making an issue of the rare instance of teen sex gone awry. Or could this be yet another effort to further tarnish Sarah Palin and her family?

As we shiver just going out for the paper in the morning on these expectedly balmy April days, our very astute leader, President Barack Hussein Obama has plans to relieve all our chills. His equally astute science adviser, “John Holdren told The Associated Press . . . that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays:” http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1&show_article=1. The AP dutifully reported that bizarre scheme which was long ago debunked as reported here: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=701. Since Obama notoriously keeps the Oval Office temperature at hothouse levels, he may not be aware that, Baby, it’s cold outside!

Undismayed by climate reality, Barack moved on to social matters and to demonstrate his commitment to transparency and objectivity nominated homosexual Harry Knox to his “faith-based minority council.” Mr. Knox, “a self-professed Christian who holds that the New Testament’s teaching that homosexual behavior is unnatural and wrong–which is found in St. Paul’s letter to the Romans–’is not true:’ ” http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=46263. Well, go figure!...
(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Genocide and Hitler's Inspiration

One can never go very far wrong overestimating the barbarity of the human species.  Nor can one go far wrong in stating that all examples of genocide are repugnant but, it would seem, some are more repugnant than others.    

Examples of genocidal attempts to systematically wipe out a race, nation or people have long stained the annals of human history, many instances now lost in the fog of time. 

Most recent genocides have occurred in Africa, in Darfur in the present century where the Sudanese government and its surrogates are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of multi-ethnic, non-Arab Muslim civilians, and in Rwanda in 1994 where rampaging Hutus are believed to have massacred over 800,000 minority Tutsis over a period of a hundred days. 

Whether the Bosnian Serb efforts at “ethnic cleansing” of the mid 1990’s technically “qualified” as true genocide has been the subject of much debate in the United Nations, which had unknowingly participated in the killing of many thousands and the rape of up to 50,000 Bosniak women and children. 

Apparently, the U.N. is much more able to debate than it has the capacity to act in a beneficial fashion since much of the Rwanda horror was conducted while U.N. “peacekeepers” were in that country acting more as facilitators than peacekeepers.  Apparently, too, when it comes to publicizing ethnic cleansing or genocide, it’s matters more whom you know than what you know.

That fact is evident from continuing reminders of the Jewish Holocaust more than six decades after its conclusion whereas, aside from show trials after the Bosnian War, relatively little is ever heard about the slaughters there, nor about the horrendous crimes and death tolls in Darfur or Rwanda. 

Granted that the Holocaust is probably the single most devastating and sickening example of genocide in the history of the planet in terms of the sheer number of Jews murdered at the hands of Adolph Hitler and Karl Adolf Eichmann.  And it should always be remembered, in the probably vain hope that remembrance will insure it “Never again” occurs.

However, if memory of the Holocaust is to be forever imprinted on the collective soul of humanity, should not other catastrophic events, massacres, mass killings, also be recalled? 

Wikipedia cites the destruction of Carthage as the first example of a genocide as well as Genghis Khan’s reign of terror and mass murders committed in ancient times by Jews themselves against their foes.  Post 1490, some 50 locales are mentioned as the scenes of mass genocidal and “gendercidal,” (males only), slaughters. 

One shameful instance of genocide that, with all the emphasis on and reminders of the Holocaust, has been widely overlooked and swept under humanity’s rug, is the “forgotten holocaust,” the World War One murder of 1.5 million Aremenians by Ottoman Turks between 1915 and 1917: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-479143/The-forgotten-Holocaust-The-Armenian-massacre-inspired-Hitler.html. It’s misrepresented as “Europe’s First Holocaust” but it did provide inspiration for Adolph Hitler's Holocaust.

More in Part II to follow.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Heterosexual Questionnaire

Sometimes lately, too often, the efforts of the homosexual lobby, the LGBT crowd, to attract America’s young people to their twisted lifestyle becomes too blatant to be ignored.  Such is the planned Day of Silence/Day of Seduction set for 10 days from now, April 17th, in Massachusetts schools and, organizers say, in hundreds of other American elementary and high schools.  For details, see http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=931.

The gay movement seems to be picking up a great head of steam since Obama’s election as they mobilize in courts, legislatures, streets, and schools to win over the public to universal acceptance of its agenda.  The most liberal president in America’s history has made it vividly clear that their agenda is his agenda. 

As with most radical movements, in their fervor and haste to conquer the public’s mind and soul, they overstep, exceed limits, and betray their essential mindset that they believe most people are too stupid to notice their machinations.  A prime example is the website, http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/.

Ostensibly, “advocates for youth,” in actuality it is as much a vehicle for the seduction and recruitment of normal young people as it functions as a support group for gay teens.

Where it most obviously shows its intent is in a poorly-constructed “heterosexual questionnaire.”  The questions try to steer youths toward favoring and adopting homosexuality but are so laughably biased in that direction that it is a virtual parody of itself, replete with distortions, false assumptions, twisted facts, and outright lies.

Below is that questionnaire, intended to serve as a lesson plan for teachers.  I took the opportunitity to supplement it with editorial commentary to set the record straight: http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/lessonplans/heterosexual2.htm

  1. What do you think caused your heterosexuality?  (Suggestion: It’s some kind of genetic flaw or disease which, given some effort, could be cured.)
  2. When and how did you first decide you were heterosexual?  (Suggestion: It’s a decision heterosexuals make, in contrast to homosexuals who insist they are born that way.)
  3. Is it possible that your heterosexuality is just a phase you may grow out of? (Suggestion: This too will pass, like biting your nails or twitching.) ...
  4. (READ THE REST at http://genelalor.com/)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Gay Marriage Quiz

“Okay, get your thinking hats on, class, please, because we have a little quiz today and let’s have no cheating, borrowing answers, or conferencing.  It’s an easy quiz, just one question, and those of you who have kept up on current affairs–and not the affairs in Hollywood or on Desparate Housewives–should do just fine if you’ve been paying attention to the world around you.”

Sounds of discontent begin.

“Ok, here we go.  You will have more than enough time to pose queries and then 10 seconds from the time I finish asking the question and the end of the Q&A to write your answer.  And stop the complaining that 10 seconds isn’t enough time.  The quiz requires only a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response.   

“The one question is, and wait until I finish asking it before you interrupt, please:  Has any state in the United States of America ever approved by a constitutional, popular vote the legalization of marriages of people of the same gender?  Yes or no?”

Suzie at once raises her hand and blurts out, “You never said we had to know this for a test!”

“Well, no, Suzie, but this isn’t a test, it’s just a quiz.”

“Yeah, but still, it’s no fair,” Suzie adds as she folds her arms in indignation and murmurs of agreement filter through the room.

“What do you mean by, ‘constitutional, popular vote,’ anyways?” Johnny blurts out.  “What’s so popular about voting?”

“No, Johnny, ‘popular’ there refers to ‘reflecting the will of the people,’ not ‘popularity’ as with rock stars, for example.”

Johnny harrumphs.

“Any other questions?”

“Yeah, Teach, ah got a question,” Lionel chimes in.  “What about this constitution thing, huh?  I mean, what’s dat got to do with it?  Who cares what some old White dudes wrote down thousands of years ago?”

Encouraged by a smattering of tepid applause, Lionel goes on.  “I mean, if some sistah and some other sistah or some brutha and some other brutha wanna make hookin’ up all legal and whatevah, why not let them be happy?  Ya know what ah mean?”

Lionel returns to his seat to another smattering.

“Umm, Lionel, I know what you mean, I think, but first of all, it was hundreds, not thousands, of years ago, 1787, to be precise, and . . .”

“Wait, what’s all this have to do with the quiz?” Dwight asks.

“Good point, Dwight, and if there are no other questions, the 10 second answering time begins now.”

“Wait, wait, hold up, please!  How much will this count toward our final average?” Suzie blurts out.

In the event it wasn’t obvious, that dialogue never actually happened verbatim although in one way or another it may well be the topic of discussion in many a classroom over the next week or so given the most recent trashing of America’s Constitution by the Iowa Supreme Court:  http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97B1TH80&show_article=1.

Once again, a judicial entity has superseded the authority and the right of the American people to determine who is legally entitled to marry whom in an ostensible democratic republic. 

This issue of homosexual marriage seems to have a life of its own.  Voted down by popular vote in California last November when Left Coasters resoundingly, and surprisingly, endorsed this simple 14 word amendment to its constitution, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California,” one would have thought the case was closed.

Not by a long shot.

Even though the vote was 52.3% to 47.7% against the gay agenda, in one of the most liberal states in the nation, that expression of the majority will of the people only ignited homosexual activists who then resorted to heated demonstrations, rioting, threats of violence, and even death threats to get their way. 

(See “Homosexuals Resort To (More) Threats of Violence,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=745, for details and links to those efforts at intimidation.) 

Undeterred by that defeat, and preceding it, homosexuals have also been resorting to liberal state courts as a remedy. . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Presidential Gaffe Tour

I have no qualms about Michelle O. actually touching the Queen of England.  Last I heard, good Queen Liz is still a human being and probably scratches an itch, goes potty, and puts her bloomers on one leg at a time. 

For America’s First Lady to reciprocally extend her arm around Liz after Liz had done the same may be a breach of British Royal Protocol, but who really cares, except the Brits? 2009-04-02-0mobamaqueen.jpg

The British Empire is long gone and the Brits should get off their high horses and dispatch them forthwith to the knackers.  Within a few generations, or less, Great Britain may be a Muslim island nation on the western border of Eurabia and the Queen’s successors may be practicing Sharia Law and an ayatollah may be sitting on her throne.

British royalty has for centuries been so puffed up with a sense of its own grandiosity that it has as little comprehension for planetary realities as it has empathy for the commoners of England, the masses who mindlessly continue to fund their opulent lifestyle for the sole purpose of preserving an antiquated tradition.

Even fellow royals such as the late Princess Diana    are ostracized when they thumb their royal noses at that tradition.  Yet, Diana’s cheating hubby, 61 year old “Prince” Charles–next in line to Mum’s throne, he thinks– is given a pass for his multitudinous peccadillos. 

Bonnie Prince Charlie is the same prince who was, allegedly, long-involved with the equinous, former Camilla Parker-Bowles and who ever-so-romantically expressed his wish to be her human tampon.   That would never have worked; Chuckie is so ultra-fastidious that he has his man servant hold the cup when he must provide a urine sample.

However, I digress.  Back to the Gaffe Tour.

Touching a royal, and gifting ipods stuffed with Obama speeches aside, there are gaffes and there are gaffes, lesser screw-ups vs. major screw-ups, big boners and little boners.

Like Michelle giving Liz a back squeeze, Barack’s bowing to a Saudi king may be attributable to sheer naivete’.  However, when the president of the United States bowed and seemed headed down to kiss the sandals of King Abduallah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, he displayed not merely lack of proper etiquette and protocol but an abject ignorance as to what the gesture meant and implied, namely subjugation to another head of state. 

See here for an upcloseandpersonal view of an American president checking to see if King Abd wears a belt: http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025498.php

That move is not faintly comparable to George W. Bush’s America-friendly wink at Queen Elizabeth a few years back–for which he was ridiculed and castigated by our mainstream media.  Obama could have given a polite head bow, which would have been bad enough, or extended his right hand to shake that of the king in a gesture of genuine friendship.  However, what he did was an overt act of obsequiousness by an American president to a foreign potentate and an insult to his country.

Perhaps because of wife Michelle’s heritage, (she is the grandchild of slaves whereas he has been called by his peers, “not black enough”), Obama may have felt it proper . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Melange: President TDB, Sexting, Oprah

These stories currently on the wires are unrelated, unless you consider that they all reflect some form of human frailty and/or idiocy.

Gimme an S, gimme a T, gimme an I, gimme an M, gimme a U, gimme an L, gimme another U, gimme an S!  S-T-I-M-U-L-U-S!  YAAA!

Hold onto your shoes!  You’re all, or most of you, are about to be stimulated!  Yee-hah!

President TDB, for Trillion Dollar Baby, made sure in all his generosity dispensing billions to banks, insurance companies, auto makers, credit card issuers, and other well-deserving recipients of his boundless largesse, that the wee people, not the leprechauns, weren’t forgotten. 

Whether they voted for him or not, most working taxpayers will be receiving–good thing you’re sitting down for this news!–a grand total of about $10-$15 a week!  There are some qualifiers, of course, but legally married couples could get up to $20! (http://www.walletpop.com/taxes/article/_a/bbdp/here-comes-your-stimulus-bonus/406933?icid=main|htmlws-main|dl3|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.walletpop.com%2Ftaxes%2Farticle%2F_a%2Fbbdp%2Fhere-comes-your-stimulus-bonus%2F406933)

Before you dash out to Burger King  and blow that windfall, just be advised that everything you eat, drink, consume in any way, such as everything in BK or Mickey D’s, supermarkets, department stores, gas stations, as well as the heating oil and electricity you use, the cigs you smoke and the booze you drink, will soon reflect the price of President TDB’s war on carbon emissions. 

Translation:  You will be paying more for those everythings, in some cases a lot more, but TDB will still be able to say he didn’t raise your taxes.  Those dastardly oil companies, utility companies, and everyone else are just charging more, for some inexplicable reason, probably for a greedy, insatiable, capitalistic reason.

In any event, it’s all former president Bush’s fault.  If you haven’t already noticed, that’s the mantra for the TDB regime and will be for the next four years.  Even Bush’s tax cuts will be the cause of all working people paying more in taxes.

How’s that?  Pay attention, now!

When the much-reviled President GWB’s tax cuts are allowed to expire in 2010, American workers will be paying even more money to the government, through the nose or through some other body aperture.  But, again, TDB won’t be raising your taxes.  He and his Democratic congressional cohorts will just not be renewing Bush’s tax cuts.  See why Bush is responsible, now?  If he had pushed for no sunset on his cuts or a twenty year window you would still have them next year and beyond to 2020. 

Suggestion:  Hold off on Burger King and instead use coupons and skip the temptation to superzize.  Bank that ten or twenty dollar weekly gift from Obama.  You’ll need it to pay your future taxes.  Better still, since your bank may go belly-up, stuff it under a mattress.  At least then it will afford you some, temporary, cushioning. 

Any Obama voters ready to repent?  If not, just remember he’s only been in office for 70 days.  Imagine the havoc he will wreak over the rest of his term!

Oh, yeah.  If you’re among the 38% of Americans who don’t pay any federal income taxes anyway or if you don’t bother to work at all, no worries, you’re immune from the hikes in payroll taxes.  You will be coughing up more for everything else but take solace in the fact they’re not direct taxes.  Indirect taxes are easier on the wallet, right? 

Sexting and Parenting, Or How Dumb Parents Don’t Teach Their Children Well:  On different but no less disturbing news, some teenies are fighting back over their constitutional and God-given right to be junior amateur porn stars by disseminating child pornography without being charged with disseminating child pornography.

The topic of “sexting” by teenies, the super fun extra-curricular and co-curricular activity of posting pictures of themselves partially clad or in their birthday suits by cell phone has been the subject of recent articles here, notably, “Teen Sexting, Texting, and Suicide,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=924.  There are always little quirks that distinguish the stories, however. 

For example, a federal judge in a Pennsylvania case, “temporarily blocked a prosecutor from filing child pornography charges against three northeastern Pennsylvania teenagers who appeared in racy photos that turned up on classmates’ cell phones:” http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429560474.

Where they did expect the photos to turn up is unclear.

Three of the 20 accused kids refused a plea deal from the prosecutor.  He guaranteed they wouldn’t be prosecuted if they accepted a very reasonable offer: “If they took a class on sexual harassment, sexual violence and gender roles. Seventeen of the students accepted the offer, but three balked and sued” the prosecutor and a federal judge upheld their complaint.

What’s most curious about that particular example in this pandemic of teens willing to strut their stuff via cell phones and the internet is that 15% of their parents had to have approved of such activities, at least retrospectively.  Fourteen and fifteen year old girls . . .

(read the rest at http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John Rich, Rebel With A Cause

 

I’m not a big aficionado of country and western music nor of country singer, John Rich, but his new hit single is worth a listen if you’re as angry as he is over Washington’s efforts to bankrupt the nation. 

It’s worth a listen if you believe that the CEO of Merrill Lynch using taxpayer bailout money to buy a $38,000. toilet is an incredible wasteful use of our money during an awful economy.

It’s worth a listen if you’re angry that this and other monumental waste is going on when people are being thrown out of work and thrown out of their homes and as workers and retireees watch their nesteggs go round and round, heading down that CEO’s toilet. 

If you believe that the D.C. shenanigans are “absolute nonsense” and reflect “a lack of reality and a lack of respect for American taxpayers” and if you further believe that the “long-term effects of spending trillions and trillions of [our] grandkids’ dollars [isn’t] worth the short-term blackjack move that [President Obama’s] making to stimulate our economy right now?” you should appreciate, “Shuttin’ Detroit Down.”

For background on John Rich and his music see the source of those John Rich quotations, http://www.theboot.com/2009/03/26/john-rich-preaches-his-own-agenda/?icid=main|htmlws-main-t2|dl5|link4|http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theboot.com%2F2009%2F03%2F26%2Fjohn-rich-preaches-his-own-agenda%2F.

To hear John Rich sing “Shuttin’ Detroit Down,” click here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW3ysJQX9Cw&feature=related.

For the lyrics, click here http://www.cowboylyrics.com/lyrics/rich-john/shuttin-detroit-down-26813.html.

For an opportunity to voice your anger over the sorry state of affairs in 2009 America, call your congressman and senators; names and numbers should be in your phone books.  You may even want to leave a message for Obama at the White House switchboard, (202) 456-1414

(202) 456-2461, so that when he gets back from his European Grand Tour after wowing his fans and wooing heads of state, he may get a reality check from the hometown folk.

 

For some personal and family consolation during these very trying times, try praying.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Frenzied Rush for Obama-slation

                                                     The Frenzied Rush for Obama-slation

There’s a plan behind the Obama frenzy to issue and overturn presidential orders and at the root of the frenzy of his fellow Democrats in Congress to propose, pass, and get signed into law legislation which radically changes the American social, economic, and political landscape.  

As for actually reading and digesting the import of any bills before Congress votes on them and the president signing them, the prevailing philosophy is:  Damn the reading, full speed ahead.  Of paramount importance is keeping focused on the election of 2010.

Rahm Emanuel,   the president’s version of Karl Rove, must be absolutely giddy over his achievements to date in this very young administration.   As Obama’s entourage headed off to Europe en masse, 500 bodies strong, including speech writers, advisors, security personnel, chefs, personal attendants, and designated bottle washers, Rahm must be proud indeed of what they have done so far.

Now comes the biggest challenge to date.  The European excursion has multiple purposes but chief among them is Obama’s need to persuade heads of state that Obama is right and that they are all as wrong as snow in April.  Whatever the results, they have good reason to be cocky, considering their successes so far.

First, there was the campaign itself, a campaign in which Obama could promise and say virtually anything and commit gaffe after gaffe with impunity, knowing the mass media would cover for him, which it did repeatedly.  Maybe, as Obama said, there really are 57 states and the rest of us just haven’t noticed the new arrivals?

Then there were all the promises he made regarding such hot topics as funding embryonic stem cell research, unfetterring gays in the military, shuttering Gitmo, massively increasing spending and taxes, pushing for union-sought card check, wiping out abortion restrictions via FOCA, instituting Cap and Trade, et al.  All those initiatives have been fulfilled or are in process of fulfillment.

Our president hasn’t yet made specific proposals on other campaign promises and implicit aims.  Sharing the wealth, dismantling the military, stemming the rising seas, restructuring the planet, climbing every mountain, swimming every sea will have to wait for his return so give the man time.

Most recently he tested the opposition waters to see what he could get away with in his quest for dictatorial powers.  Obama crossed his Rubicon with his outrageous and unprecedented dismissal by fiat of the CEO of a major American corporation.  And there was barely a ripple in the waters. 

Call it a power grab or a dictatorial presumption by a power hungry Chief Executive, President Obama tipped his hand with that action.  He revealed what some of us have long suspected, that he sees himself far removed from the norm of what a president is and what powers a president should have in a representative democratic republic. 

There was good reason for his nickname, the Obamassiah. 

GM’s Rick Wagoner ostensibly stepped down at the president’s “behest,” a euphemism for “demand” and took his $22 million . . .

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Potpourri of Observations and Intimations

We live in a busy and tempestuous world and, indisputably, all too interesting times.  Some headlines, however, give cause for reflective amusement. 

“Canada Says Will Defend Its Arctic.” http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.92e661444313b232e8931de00c29c73b.3a1&show_article=1.

Canada, that huge but mostly inhospitable and uninhabitable country to America’s north, is in a dither.  Torn between its quest to be taken seriously as a member of the community of nations and its requisite reliance on the United States for its survival, it is now threatened by the Russian Bear that Governor Palin can see from her porch.

Resurging Russia, of late deflated by oil prices in its own quest to regain its status as a world power, is eyeballing the Arctic as a source of almost limitless natural resources, principally oil and gas reserves.  Made accessible thanks to the natural and cyclical effects of selective global warming and ice melt, those resources have now become a point of contention between the Bear and the Canucks.

Bravely, Canada, which has always been a staunch American ally but which has gotten testy of late as it evolves into a European-style socialist state. . .

 

“Police Identify 200 Children As Potential Terrorists,” http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-identify-200-children-as-potential-terrorists-1656027.html

Britainistan, that island nation in Western Eurabia, is waking up to the Islamic threat to its autonomy and security.  Long a favorite for emigres from Muslim nations, as are Francistan, Hollandistan, and Germanistan, Brits have been aware of that threat for years but are still bending over sideways to mollify resident Islamists despite that awareness. 

“Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and Britain’s most senior officer in charge of terror prevention” revealed that “Two hundred schoolchildren in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are ‘vulnerable’ to Islamic radicalisation.”

Considering the Muslim upheavals that are becoming almost commonplace throughout Eurabia and Britainistan, including the burning of the Brit flag, abusing troops returning from war, and 8 Muslims now on trial for attempting to blow up trans-Atlantic air flights, that was pretty bodacious of Sir Norman to say. 

Also, considering the intimidation factor of some 2 million, unhappy, restless, mostly poor  . . .

 

“Connecticut School Bans Physical Contact,” http://wcbstv.com/local/school.bans.hugs.2.969949.html.

In a classic and typical overreaction by public school administrators, Connecticut’s East Shore Middle School Principal Catherine Williams has declared in a letter to parents that a “no touching” policy has been instituted for her students.  School personnel have observed kids ”kicking others in the groin area, grabbing and touching of others in personal areas, hugging and horseplay.”  To counter this untoward behavior, “Physical contact is prohibited to keep all students safe in the learning environment.”

On the surface, such a policy is commendable.  Beneath that surface, it’s beyond the pale.

Parents are understandably outraged, not because they want their kids kicked in their privates or like the idea of their daughters, or sons, willingly engaging in intimate activity and/or being the victims of uninvited intimate behaviors in school, but because the no-touch policy would outlaw innocent hugs and high-fives and general “goofing around. . .”  

 

“DNA Says 13 Year Old Isn’t a Dad,” http://news.aol.com/article/british-boy-isnt-father/398888?icid=main|htmlws-main|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fbritish-boy-isnt-father%2F398888.

Readers may recall the recent scandal in formerly Great Britain that wasn’t considered much of a scandal by the individuals involved.  I refer to the matter of young Alfie Patten, the Sussex lad who believed he had impregnated his neighbor, Chantelle Steadman, when he was all of 12 and she an apparently quite promiscuous 14.  See here for all the lurid details: http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=837  KIDS IN A TANGLE: Alfie & Chantelle insist he's Maisie's dad—but mates argue

The waifish Alfie and the unlikely object of his lust both contended he was the daddy of Baby Maisie but then competitor teen lotharios popped out of the woodwork. . .

(Read the rest of these observations at http://genelalor.com/)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack, a Product of His Syndromes? II

Barack, a Product of His Syndromes II
Content:

“Some kids just never catch a break.  Some get so warped by their early lives that the rest of their days are so haunted and taunted by the ghosts of their upbringing that they end up as twisted human beings hooked on drugs or with other addictions, their minds so disturbed by the experiences of their youth and childhood that they spend their dysfunctional lives harming themselves and everyone around them.”

Thus began Part One of this very mini series which attempts a pop-psych analysis of what makes President Barack Hussein Obama tick.   There are more than a few indicators that suggest he suffers from ACS, Abandoned Child Syndrome, and from what could be called ICS, Interracial Copulation Syndrome, either of which could affect a child well into adulthood.  In combination, they could make the next four years a harrowing four years should President Barack Hussein Obama truly be suffering from these syndromes.

With Part One, we described those syndromes and made a general case for Obama’s affliction(s).  With Part Two we examine what he has already done, and said, which supports that theory.

Much has been made recently of what people are calling just one more gaffe oozing out of this administration, Obama’s already infamous ridiculing of the Special Olympics, thus ridiculing the hundreds of physically- and mentally-challenged athletes who compete in that annual olympiad for the disabled.

For a replay and transcript of that ”gaffe” see http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/03/obama_american_idol_special_ol.html.  For additional Obamian/Bidenian flubs, replete with videos, see Toby Harnden’s view on the Telegraph.com: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/toby_harnden/blog/2009/03/20/top_10_gaffes_by_barack_obama_and_joe_biden_.

The gaffe-meister himself, Vice President Joe Biden, is not the subject of the present study.  He merits his own mini-series, or a multi-season-long study, to adequately cover his penchant for inane and simply stupid actions and slips of the lips.  For now we will center our focus on the president and how he has demonstrated his possible ACS and ICS affliction.

As mentioned in Part One, Obama has sought to over-compensate, feasibly as a method of concealing those ailments.  Ridiculing others, especially the defenseless such as Special Olympics’ participants, is a transparent sign of the insensitive bully who seeks to hide his own weaknesses and insecurities by demeaning those who can’t fight back.  It can also reflect the defense mechanism of passive aggression.  

He laughed as he joked about his bowling ability, “like the Special Olympics,” and Jay Leno, video  being the obsequious Democrat sheep that he is, failed to call him on it.  Obama also babbled on about “moral and ethical concerns” in a different context, AIG bonuses.  However, both host and guest failed to see the incongruity when they both laughed at Obama’s yuk regarding the Special Olympics after he spoke about morals and ethics.

Obama employed that same laughter on 60 Minutes...

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/.)

Tags: obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Racism Isn't Racism

The word “racism” seems to be bandied about with such frequency in America that it’s as if at least every third word emanating from some communities is either the charge of racism or the epithet, racist.  I think that since it’s almost as commonplace as the use of the N-word in rap lyrics and since it’s so often misused, racism should be banished like the N-word has been from the American lexicon, even in rap lyrics.

To my knowledge, no other word but that N-word has ever been deemed so repulsive that it was deemed necessary to forbid its use, under penalty of law in some jurisdictions, and to dispatch it to the depths of a new Dantesque circle of Hell.

Granted, n****r isn’t a very pleasant word, nor are flatulence, vomit, and thousands of other English words.  The terms ”AOL” and “politics” are almost equivalently unpleasant to millions of people, to students the initials ”SAT’s” can evoke tremors of disgust and trepidation, and to the Irish the word “British” can have comparable effects.

The preceding excursion into reductio ad absurdam is meant to accent the absurdity of overreaction to the N-word and to emphasize the overuse and selective use of the charge of racism in our society.  Very often it is applied to crimes committed against Hispanics by Whites which cannot be termed racism since both Whites and (most) Hispanics are Caucasians.  If anything, it could be called, “ethnicism.”

As kids, we used to chant, “Sticks and stones can break my bones but names will never harm me,” in a lame response to verbal harassment.  Today, the school harasser would be accused of bullying or worse and probably be consigned to detention or sent home on suspension.  More absurdity.

The banning of the N-word is made conspicuously more ridiculous by virtue of the fact that equally mean-spirited and derogatory terms such as spic, kike, mick, guinea, chink, slope et al., which I am permitted to use without fear of legal repercussions, are permissible even if not condoned.   They certainly do not raise hackles like the use of “n****r” does. 

While I don’t endorse or advocate the use of any such terms in writing or in social discourse, I also don’t endorse or advocate the actions of today’s PC mentality which makes their use tantamount to screaming, “Fire!” in a crowded movie theater when there is no fire and when the results could be catastrophic. 

We Americans of Irish descent have gotten over being treated like dirt and being avoided like the plague by “polite” society.  We ignored the ubiquitous warning signs that “Irish Need Not Apply”  and we applied anyway and when we were rejected as unfit we moved on and secured other jobs, sometimes better jobs, sometimes worse, but our forebears knew that bitching was counterproductive so they just worked harder.

We elected an Irish-American president in 1960   and, if we ever had any doubts, we forever abandoned any thoughts that we were second class, or permanently steerage class, American citizens.

I understand the emotional baggage associated with the word n****r which conjures up within the Black community visions of slavery, discrimination, Jim Crow Laws, etc. 

However, slavery is long gone in our world, except in Black Muslim Sudan and in a rare few other places outside the U.S, and systemic, legalized racism has been legislated out of existence for generations in America thanks to, literally, thousands of federal, state, and local statutes which make it a criminal act.

When Barack Hussein Obama was elected President of the United States last November 4th, millions of Americans assumed that would be the final nail in the coffin of alleged racism against Blacks.  Forty three percent of White Americans voted for him, which was proof positive that Jim Crow was dead and America could finally move on as a racially unified nation.

That was not to be, mainly because almost 100% of Black Americans effectively voted for racism by casting their ballots against the White candidate, John McCain.  Our new Black Attorney General later made it vividly clear that he believed if Joe Six-Pack didn’t invite Tyrone-Ripple to his next family bbq then Joe was evidently a racist, and a coward to boot:  http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=847

The latest example of Black racism run amok are the protests against White, Jewish comedian Jackie Mason’s use of the yiddish word, “schwartza,” in reference to Blacks, http://www.popeater.com/movies/article/jackie-mason-racism-charges/383621:  ”Mason

(Read the rest at http://genelalor.com/.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ireland and the Irish Part One

The following is a re-publication of an article, “Ireland Today,” previously published, sans the graphics, on AmericanThinker.com, July 29th, 2006, http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/07/ireland_today.html.  Part Two to follow is a commentary on the changes in Ireland over the last 3 1/2 years.

‘Dear, dirty Dublin,’ James Joyce infamously maligned the capital of his native country, Ireland and, while it’s still dear in many ways, his city and his country have come a very long way.  More than a quarter century ago, inspired by Alex Haley’s Roots, I decided to take my family back to this land of our own roots and finally meet the aunts, uncles and cousins I had never seen and visit the places and tourist sites I had only heard about. 

It was then still a sleepy, little country with its picturesque and quaint villages and counties.   With its thousand shades of green, due to its many fine, soft rains, with its countless pristine lakes, streams and rivers, with its tumbledown ancient castles, its peat bogs, its tiny roads where people drive on the wrong side of the road, its Blarney Stone, Ring of Kerry, Galway Bay, Cliffs of Moher, Aran Islands, it was a beautiful, simple place then.  

And, Mr. Joyce, Dublin was bustling, but far from dirty.   But the Ireland of 1978 could not hide the reality that it was a benighted land. 

The Battle of the Boyne in 1690 had been a watershed and since that British victory on that July day, the fate of Ireland was sealed for centuries.  Great Britain and its agents, notably the soulless Oliver Cromwell, systematically starved, persecuted and slaughtered the Irish.  The aptly named Penal Laws followed and brought more misery to the Irish people.  Then came the  Great Potato Famine, the Hunger, (1845-1850), which, combined with forced emigration decimated the population.   Three million people either died or left and Ireland wouldn’t recover for a century and a half. Not until it became the Celtic Tiger, the New Emerald Isle, with a new and well-earned sense of pride.

We visited Ireland again in 2000 and 2003.   My wise and aging uncle, one of the few relatives left by then, profoundly  said in 2000, ‘We’ve traded our soul for prosperity.’   And, indeed, a phenomenal prosperity had swept the country by then, accompanied by a sea change in Irish mores, culture, politics and outlook.  They say some things never change and outside Dublin much of the old charm of Ireland was alive and well.  

But, it was a different life and wellness.  New cars and new housing and vastly improved infrastructure are visible everywhere.   And the Irish take delight in the fact that thousands of Britons were now crossing the Irish Sea to seek employment in Ireland, reversing the flow of humanity of the previous hundred years.  And it’s not just Brits who are flocking to the Old Sod.   By the time of my most recent visit in 2006, Iranians, Nigerians, Iraqis, Cambodians, VietNamese, Chinese, people of virtually every  nationality were relocating to Ireland seeking jobs and a better life and  citizenship.  

A puckish cousin had asked me on one of my visits, ‘Now, could you tell me what an American looks like?’   I answered that we look like what an Irishman will look like— in a few generations.

In July, 2006, Ireland was pronounced the second richest country in the world, after Japan, in terms of real estate values.  Properties which were valued at thousands of Irish pounds ten years earlier were now valued at hundreds of thousands of Euros with many in Dublin reaching a million Euros! Newspapers were declaring that in order to maintain a comfortable standard of living in Dublin a couple would need to earn upwards of 150,000 euros annually.  As in the United States, people anticipated that the housing bubble would soon burst and when it did the thriving economy would crash and burn.  However, they hope, that would be some time in the indefinite future.

Meanwhile, despite all the good news, there’s still a dark side to life in Ireland today.  The once-vaunted health system (acclaimed when the now-defunct Irish Sweepstakes financed hospitals) was now in serious trouble. 

A number of people shared anecdotes about how friends and relatives had gone to emergency rooms and were kept on gurneys for more than twenty four hours before they even saw a doctor.   In 2005, only five of fifty four hospitals were rated by the government as hygienically ‘good,’ a figure that most were able to improve in 2006, but the hospitals were still woefully behind most international standards.   New hospitals are being built by the cash-flush government, but some were opening without beds.  Staffing was another problem and, though the doctors, nurses, and aides that I met seemed competent and pleasant, the facilities were clearly shorthanded and their staffs had to be supplemented by foreigners, some with minimal English language skills.

Were health care the only negative in the Celtic Tiger’s new culture, it would be sad enough.  There’s also the baby boom. . . 

(Read the rest of this article at http://genelalor.com/) 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive